One Event and Two Outcomes

Thursday, September 21, 2017

the writer: Dr. Reza Hazeli

The destruction of the real elite class of the country during the Islamic Revolution and the lack of independent think tanks that take into account the national and civilizational interests of Iran and Iranians, have caused the country of Iran and the Iranian civilization to be confused and bewildered and do not even recognize their own interests, and every day step by step, they are sending their sick people to death and complete destruction. The occupation of all the high political, judicial, and legislative positions of Iran by Iraqi-born or Arab-loving and Arab-born people, and the lack of importance of Iran’s national and civilizational interests for them on the one hand, and the lack of national think tanks, have caused the tribune of Iranian nationalism to fall into the hands of white reactionaries who oppose modernity and oppose blind and reactionary decentralization, and the pinnacle of their art is that instead of reactionary thought and The fanaticism of the absolute velayat-e faqih should replace it with another reactionary ideology such as Far-e-Izadi! The low IQ and unrelated educational background of these engineers and dentists have become philosophers and sociologists and have caused the Iranian nation to play with their immature ideas and stupid and emotional prejudices and irresponsibly play with the fate of a nation.

One of the important issues that is happening in the Middle East, and only a few Iranian intellectuals and intellectuals have realized its importance and analyzed it correctly, is the issue of the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan. The author of this article, as the founder of the Iranzamin school, has dealt with this issue and others in the manifesto of this school of thought, but some of the positions of Iraqi-born officials or Iraqis or only Arab-born and white, black, and red Iranian reactionaries about this event have compelled the author to examine this issue in a special way. Arab racism and Arab fanaticism, which has occupied the land under the guise of Iran’s Islamic thought, is going to provoke some simple-minded, emotional, and unfamiliar Iranians with strategic sciences, to wage a fratricidal war among Iranians, and to kill the Iranian Kurds in occupied Kurdistan in order to preserve the territorial integrity of the Arab state of Iraq. This Arab nationalism, which has defended all non-Islamic Arab states for four decades under the cover of Islamic thoughts, and has spent all the national wealth, human resources, dignity and prestige of the country of Iran on Arab countries with non-Islamic governments, is now willing to sacrifice the Iranian Kurds in occupied Kurdistan in Iraq in order to preserve the territorial integrity of its fatherland, Iraq, just as it sacrificed the entire Iranian nation. The interests of the Arab states. Interestingly, this Arab nationalism occupying Iran, under the guise of Islam, wants Islam and its velayat-e faqih only for Iran, not for Baathist Syria, not even for secular Iraq! Arab nationalism, which is inherently anti-Semitic, denies any common interests between Iran and Israel in the region, such as the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan, under the pretext that it is an Israeli conspiracy, but it does not mention the eight-year war and the second Qadisiyyah that the Arab state of Iraq and all its Arab allies imposed on Iran, nor does it mention the hundreds of billions of dollars spent by Saudi Arabia on Saddam, nor the invading Egyptian and Iraqi soldiers To the Iranian girls and mothers in front of their eyes in Khorramshahr Stadium, not to the millions of Iranian victims and veterans in this second Qadisiyyah, nor to the thousands of billions of dollars in war compensation that Iraq must pay to Iran. Undoubtedly, and according to most unbiased experts in strategic sciences, the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan is in the interest of Iran’s national and civilizational interests, and it will divide one of Iran’s most susceptible neighboring countries to enmity and attack Iran into two weaker countries, so that Iran will no longer witness a third Qadisiyyah. On the other hand, by creating satellites of Iranian origin but weaker than Iran, it will also expand the depth of Iran’s strategic influence around Iran, or at least expand buffer zones or buffer zones around Iran, which will strengthen Iran’s national security in general, and therefore, in this case, Iran shares interests with Israel. On the other hand, it creates an independent route for the transportation of Iranian gas to Europe and through the Mediterranean Sea that is not under the influence of Russia or Turkey and competes with them. Also, by pressuring the independent government of Kurdistan, it is easy to control the separatist Iranian Kurds and it will be a country where such people go, and thus the Kurds in Iran will be part of the single nation of Iran, but at the same time, the Kurdish nation will have its own country in the independent Iraqi Kurdistan. Although the state of Kurdistan in northern Iraq has existed for more than twenty years, Iran should be the first country to recognize its independence if this region declares its independence from Iraq, just as it correctly recognized the independence of Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Turkmenistan from the Soviet Union, and today it no longer has a land border with a giant like the Soviet Union or today’s Russia, and its territorial security has been ensured more than ever.

Also, just as the Kurdistan Region is a place for the export of Iranian goods, in the future, it will also have a block of economic, political, military, and security unions of the countries of Iranian civilization along with Tajikistan and Afghanistan, etc.

which will make the Iranian civilization in general stronger and its nature more diverse, which the author of this article has explained in the manifesto of the Iranzamin school or modern Iranian nationalism from a civilizational point of view. But this event, which can lead to an auspicious outcome with an appropriate and wise response from Iran, can have a terrible consequence for Iran with an inappropriate and wrong reaction from Iran, and even lead to the separation of Iranian Kurdistan from Iran. If, after the independence of the Kurdistan Region, Iran closes its borders to Kurdistan and does not recognize the independence of Kurdistan, then the Kurdistan Region will also become a base for the independence seekers of Iranian Kurdistan and will impose years of bloody war within civilization and fratricide on Iran. It will also push the Kurdistan region towards an alliance with Israel and possibly Turkey, and the unity of Iranian countries and civilized countries will become a dream, and Iran will lose its sphere of influence, strategic depth, and buffer zones, and Iran’s national security will be severely fragile from the western borders. In addition to the discussions of national, civilizational and strategic interests mentioned above, from the point of view of historical honor, by not recognizing the independence of the Kurdistan Region, Iran will sacrifice an Iranian tribe, which is far from the historical honor of Iran, and in a period when the Turks support and defend their compatriots with the theories of neo-Ottomanism and the Arabs with mechanisms such as Arab NATO, Iran It will lightly and short-sightedly betray its historical honor and its national and civilizational interests, a betrayal that will not be forgotten by the 40 million Kurds in the Middle East. Although the heart of true Iranians is with the independence of the Kurdistan Region, the Arab nationalism that has occupied Iran under the guise of Islamic thought, either consciously and directly through the Iraqi-born officials of the Islamic Republic or through the ostensible mercenary nationalists of the Islamic Republic, is hostile to the Kurdistan Region and tries to turn this event, which can have auspicious consequences for the country of Iran and Iranian civilization, into an event. with destructive consequences for Iran and the region. It should be emphasized here that the reaction to this event is more important than the event itself, and it is Iran’s reaction that shapes its consequences.